The Spectrum:
If only it
was an evil organisation, perhaps the Pupil Eco Committee could combat it.
However, and
alas, 'the spectrum' describes the new pupil reality that finds a significant
proportion of pupils credited to this shady group and apparently working for it
as professional-level class disrupters, a task at which most excel. Why so many
children, and especially boys, are arriving as basically psychiatric cases sporting
a veritable alphabet of autist-like descriptive labels, ADD, ADHD, ODD, etc, and in need of
various types of extra support (and funding), is a question that can be
discretely asked (noting that walls have ears in school!), but cannot be honestly
answered. Identifying the various environmental toxics, device radiation, late
motherhood, broken families, intentionally single parents, phoney pedagogy, classroom
stressors like BBC Newsround, the IT/TV existence and the whole panoply of a garbage
lifestyle lived indoors, would not be permitted. And, not least, metabolic
poisoning obtained by eating and drinking basically sugar. This is why I make
no reference to these factors here.
(To those who
propose genetic collapse as a factor, I present, as a contribution to the
debate, the current batch of Scottish MPs.)
Precisely
how many of these children are genuinely handicapped, as opposed to just some variety
of strange that would be fixable by the simple remedy of fresh air, sunlight,
exercise, proper food, sleep and discipline is a question that an old school
teacher could answer, but would be more safely left nowadays to top dollar
funded experts.
Of course, I
do not wish to deny children support they need, but still wonder how much the
diagnoses are linked to a feedback loop wherein artfully constructed (or
disingenuous) definitions access funding and encourage a swarming class of
professional beneficiaries allied to concerned, confused or (honestly) victimhood-seeking
parents, each driving the other to create more of the same and hence further
justify itself. The motivation and behaviour of any one actor (be they parent,
teacher or health professional) within this loop may be entirely rational, even
while the loop itself may be irrational– except if viewed as yet another
manifestation of the society-destroying processes which shape our modern lives.
What think
ye?
ADDENDUM
This reflection was inspired by a recent article that
described the dramatic rise in autism diagnosed over the last generation as, in
fact, mainly a rise in its reporting.
This allegedly based on two related phenomena; the social trend of
shifting spectrum children, who would have formerly attended a specialist
institution, into mainstream schools (aka, mainstreaming) with this development
making such children more visible and leading in turn to concomitant changes in
reporting protocols; and (as noted above) the politicisation and monetisation
of definitions and diagnoses.
While I find myself in
broad agreement with part of the author’s thesis, my Spidey sense tells me that
she is more wrong than right; in that there is indeed a true rise in the
numbers of such children for at least some of the reasons already referred to.
The comments accompanying the article demonstrate how politicised (weaponised
even?) such science has become with the protagonists seemingly unable to
approach evidence free from partisan proselytising of their preferred societal
agenda. One cannot ‘trust the science’ here. And it is for this very reason
that I have abandoned to oblivion all such studies, where they pertain to
education, as sources of either information or policy; preferring instead the scientific
evidence of my own eyes and ears.
Regardless, no useful ‘expert’ conclusion will ever be
reached about this issue as autistic and related type pupils are among the many
passengers locked aboard the runaway train to hell.
(The focus of the article was the USA, but its descriptions probably
apply to anywhere in the West.)
No comments:
Post a Comment