The
Tale of the Golliwog: Part 1½
In
considering the second part to the tale of the golliwog, I was gifted by
Providence an illustration of the wider point I was hoping to make. Although
outside the domain of school education, the example seemed so apposite that it
justified the interpolation. And so, I set aside Part 2 temporarily to address
this issue with a Part 1½:
A
friend was telling me about a recent Rangers game which took place in France to
an empty stadium- as per Covid guidelines. Prior to the game the team were
obliged to ‘take the knee’ in an act of obeisance to, ostensibly, BLM and their
racialist claims. This ‘protest’ was clearly divisive for the players; the
Whites mainly ignoring it and the ethnic and mixed-race others enthusiastic, some
to the point of raised fists - Black power! A message directed, one can only
suppose, to (or against?) in order, football fans, Rangers fans and their
fellow players.
One
can imagine how quickly any expression of disagreement between players will
segue to the usual accusations and become divisive; thus damaging of team
unity.
Many
fans objected to this display on social media, arguing that this issue is
nothing to do with Rangers or Scottish football. In response, certain Rangers
players accused their own fans of racism. The chairman became involved too, but
not as a defender of the club whose purpose is football, nor of the fans attempt
to distance themselves from the controversy of racialist arguments, but of the apparent
principle that underlies the BLM protest.
This
issue will run on, but note that the confrontation starts with an insult to
fans – who are supposed to accept, as a given; the legitimacy of the BLM
movement, the premise of the racialist assumptions
that underlie it, their own complicity in this alleged White racism and the
rightness of Rangers’ involvement in it.
Leaving aside the temptation to explore these issues, and not least the
various ironies involved in wealthy and privileged ‘black’ sportsmen pretending
to be brave and principled at the expense of their own fans’ feelings, we
return to our thesis.
What
does this tell us with respect to our argument regarding racial justice and school
education?
Firstly,
by being in a completely different societal domain it reinforces what we already
know about the destructive impact of this collective, anti-racism madness.
Namely, that no institution is safe from accusations of racism, regardless of
the relevance or ridiculousness of such claims, and that the interests of those
affected by such claims are ignored. That those who should protect us from such
have got no intention of doing so; indeed, so important is it for them to appear
on-board with the anti-racism mission, that they will willingly, sometimes
gratuitously, alienate shareholders, customers and (in the case of Rangers)
those supporters whose loyalty gives life to the institution. Suddenly, the
fans find that their club has been repurposed to a political end; and that
although they might be the club, they don’t own it, nor enjoy the proper respect of
those who do! Such for Rangers - and the
same for any other sports club, organisation, or school!
Secondly,
a template is held out to school children, irrespective of their interest in
football, of how to behave and think; your favourite team apparently recognising
the truth of White systemic racism by kneeling and black fisting for racial
justice. And those who query, however slightly, the legitimacy of this movement
are cast into darkness by social media, news media, celebrity puppet-activists,
even club chairmen. How could this NOT be
seen as operant conditioning?*
Finally,
and most importantly, it illustrates the power which lies behind this
racialisation of social life. This has largely been invisible within the school
context, as it may have seemed to arrive on the back of the citizenship elements
of the curriculum. Concerned adults and parents could perhaps dismiss this
development as a passing phase or a minor issue.
But
when we consider the case of BLM and Rangers as a representative of this racialisation
of seemingly everything, we realise that we are dealing with a force much more
powerful than a mere foreign protest movement. And that has implications for
the development of racial grievance politics in our schools.
How
can it be so, that a newly, and supposedly spontaneously, founded foreign, political-activist
organisation - predicated on issues that have no connection to us – can arrive
in Europe fully-funded and able to instantly exert such influence? How can it be so, that our native football
teams are obliged to do homage to, largely, career-criminal Black Americans
repurposed as saintly innocents. Try to get the football league, or your own
favourite team, to take the knee as a protest for injustices that concern you
or us in Scotland and see how far this gets you? You already know the answer!
In
thinking this through we can see the intent and gigantic power behind this
phenomenon in its ability to subvert, divide and co-opt accomplices, even to
the point of them destroying their own organisations and businesses. We must
surely, then, fear its potential within schools, faced with much more innocent
minds – not least the already gulled, fem-bot teachers.
If
only we could discover which group may be behind this phenomenon; they would
have to have international access to massive funding, control of social and
news media and have global political leverage. Hmm!,…this does not seem to
describe Black people. Perhaps someone will work out the answer?
What think ye?
* Repeatedly modelling behaviour to the target
to get them to copy it without even thinking. By encouraging certain behaviours,
this technique also legitimises the associated thoughts or theories behind it -
also without thinking about it.
excellent article...I think we all know who that is
ReplyDeletebut further comment risks a catastrophic own goal.
Concur, the best response to this comment is...
ReplyDeleteAlas, yes.
ReplyDeleteRangers, in common with all football clubs, is such a tempting target for those who want to destroy us. This is because it is a British institution, now venerable and, most importantly was founded by, and mainly for, ordinary white men. And what a symbol of victory that would be! The entire institution of British football, all those white men, on their knees – literally!
It would be a nothing to split a club internally, exploit the rivalry between clubs to foster further division (e.g., other clubs’ fans could be brought on-board with the mission by being encouraged to identify rivals as racists or homophobes or whatever, and find media support for this ‘good’ thinking), found and fund an anti-racist Rangers group, exploit some footage of such a group being ‘persecuted’ by Rangers fans, and have a human-rights lawyer on speed dial! All this has already happened to American football – the playbook has now been written. Those fans from other clubs who may enjoy the discomfort of their rivals, will not enjoy this for very long! That the game could disappear into chaos, or just disappear, would be the away win desired!
Who cares, they were all racists anyway!
And Saturday afternoon spent Amazon shopping instead- HUNTERS PART 4 and CRACKA PART 2 is coming out soon.
This is the visible part.
What you don’t see is;
the leverage exerted through the banks on which the clubs depend to get on-board with the mission – this is why the supermarkets have all ‘donated’ to the anti-racism cause.
the (bank-owned) news and entertainment media agenda to relentlessly shove this issue in the fans’ faces and vilify those who disagree,
and the quietly setting up of laws and lawsuits to pursue this through the courts. Honourable mention to the BBC who does this on your dollar!
the behind the scenes politicking to create the laws to enable this and allow the funding of the human-rights lawyers to pursue the destruction – you must have noticed a pattern when such lawyers show their faces.
the agenda driven by the advertising industry, also owned by the same banks (and managed by the same mystery people) to normalise this whole situation.
It’s all about love and fairness – and reparations.